By Dawn Bonfield MBE (CEC Executive Committee)
After over a week at COP26 I spent my final day paying some attention to the position of the Commonwealth countries at the conference, and looking at the role of the Commonwealth Engineers Council through the lens of climate action. The Commonwealth Engineers Council is one of a number of organisations affiliated to the Commonwealth, but its role in addressing the current climate challenges must be central. The CEC is made up of member organisations who represent the engineering professional institutions of the countries they represent, so what is our role and how can we make a difference?
As with the Commonwealth Secretariat itself, the role of the collective representative organisations is one of diplomacy and advocacy, in particular on behalf of the small island states and other front line countries which are disproportionately affected by climate change. The CEC also has a dissemination role to spread best practice, and to share not only learning, but also to share real stories of how climate change is affecting the lives and livelihoods of its members, so that we can understand how best to address these impacts. And of course, coming up with innovative solutions is what we are all about in engineering. Our strength as an organisation is our ability to bring different countries together, and to use the power of our collective voice to speak louder in unison than any of us can do individually.
The 54 commonwealth nations are home to one third of the world’s population, 60% of whom are under the age of 30. There is a great opportunity – and need – to engage with these young professionals.
The Secretariat has an Innovation Agenda that is made up of five pillars, which are:
One of the things I have heard a lot about whilst at COP is the need for finance to reach the most affected countries in a timely way, which is not happening at present. The other big theme is around representation – to have a voice, a seat at the table, and a say in decision making. This COP has been particularly criticised for lack of inclusion, so advocacy on behalf of those not present is even more important.
Having the option of representation at COP26 in future years, through enrolling as an observer organisation with UNFCCC would seem like a useful step to take, but coming with a clear position, and an engagement strategy is crucial to getting the most out of the event. Speaking to a colleague from the Youth Activities for Nuclear Power in Climate Change group, who attended COP26 for the first time this year, having a clear mission and strategy is key, and they certainly had one which paid off. https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/key-role-for-nuclear-power-in-climate-change-urged-by-youth-activists-at-cop26-event
Next year, I believe that there will be much more of a Built Environment focus, so maybe this is an opportunity for CEC to engage? Or maybe we wait for the next Commonwealth COP? But whether we decide to attend or not, having some clear goals and ambitions around our response to climate change as a Commonwealth organisation is an important thing for us to address.
9/23/2021 0 Comments
By Prof. Paul W. Jowitt
First published on Engineers Against Poverty Website| 20 April 2021
Last year EAP Chair, Paul Jowitt facilitated Infrastructure-Led Community Resilience a webinar hosted by the Commonwealth Sustainable Cities Initiative and UNESCO. In this blog, he reflects on the discussion of how infrastructure and engineering sectors can meet pressing global challenges of climate change and rapid urbanization.
The 1960s and the trickle-down theory
In 1962, President Kennedy said “We choose to go to the moon in this decade (…) because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills — because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one we intend to win.”
I was 12 years old. Seven years later as a student engineer working in Liverpool and lodging in a simple hotel I stayed up late, looking at snowy images on a grainy black and white TV as Neil Armstrong set foot on the moon. It was a triumph of science and engineering. And so exciting as a young engineer to witness it. I was one of millions equally enthused.
Over recent years there has been talk of women and men travelling to Mars. Am I just as excited? I’m afraid not.
Famine and drought were no strangers in the 1960s, but with communications as they were, they featured far less in the news. Much the same was true about the impacts of wars and the plight of refugees. And the environment? Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, published in the same year as Kennedy’s speech, was hardly on everyone’s reading list, far less on those of politicians and industrialists. The environment was treated as a limitless free good. Now we know better.
The 1960s mantra was that scientific and technological discoveries of space exploration would lead to exciting spinoffs benefitting humanity at large. The ‘trickle-down’ theory. From an international development perspective this did indeed happen. By 1984, improved satellite communications, one of the trickle-down effects of the space race, brought news reports of the Ethiopian famine into millions of people’s living rooms and inspired the Live Aid concerts in 1985.
The millennium and a renewed call for action
At the turn of the millennium, the eight UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) were established to address extreme poverty. By their 2015 target date, the progress made towards achieving them, can in part, be attributed to engineers and others working in partnership (MDG 8) to deliver the underpinning infrastructure upon which civilisation depends.
But with the MDGs now recast into the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), there is still an enormous amount to do. And it is now abundantly clear to almost all rational minds that reaching zero carbon is now an imperative, yet the work needed to address the climate change goal is hard and real.
A shift in focus
Technological innovation has always led to waves of change – economically, socially, environmentally and culturally. It can be traced back in history, through the industrial revolution to the present day. Successive changes brought about transformations in power production, locomotion and transport, materials, medicine, electrical networks, communications and the digital world.
Very few of the changes were planned, but they were rather the emergent properties of what had been developed. And whilst many improved the human condition, they have led to the condition we are in and which we now need to urgently address. Matters such as climate change, plastic pollution, urban sprawl, biodiversity loss and so on. We are now at a turning point.
Do we continue to accept whatever unplanned science and technology delivers? Or is it time to focus on defining the outcomes we want and then seek the scientific and technological innovation required to deliver them?
For me, it’s the latter. And it’s why I am not excited by Mars. The trickle-down effect, if it ever delivered much in the past, is not going to deliver the SDGs. It won’t flush many toilets or light many lights or feed many hungry mouths of homeless people in unplanned settlements in areas of risk. And it won’t stop climate change.
The real-systems problem
Many cities at risk from natural disasters and disease are also often those where the underpinning infrastructure provision is poor or non-existent, with unsafe water, sanitation and solid waste disposal. Despite their apparent unattractiveness, they are often powerful magnets for migration and the source of endogenous population growth. They are also often characterised by poor local governance and a lack of legal tenure.
These real systems problems need innovative solutions and deserve the attention of engineers and allied professions and other complementary professions to deliver systems level solutions.
Women in Wakiso District bring concerns on local infrastructure projects to decision-makers
An example from the EAP hosted programme, CoST – the Infrastructure Transparency Initiative demonstrates how greater transparency and accountability in infrastructure delivery can result in better infrastructure in such areas.
Wakiso District, an area outside Uganda’s bustling capital rapidly urbanized and as the local council rushed to support the population influx through new infrastructure projects, many challenges presented. The council failed to adequately consult the community and unsafe road projects were delivered that were prone to speeding, flooding and health and sanitation issues. CoST raised awareness on the issues by bringing the community together with the council who then rectified the issues.
Initiatives like CoST provide value for money in the infrastructure sector and are key to meeting global infrastructure investment needs and delivering essential infrastructure to millions of ordinary people.
Building engineering capacity
Sadrine Musabyimana, a previous intern who benefitted from our work who now works as a civil engineer in Rwanda
The engineering and built environment professions also have a key role to play, but we also know that their presence is often thin on the ground as can be shown by this recent Commonwealth Sustainable Cities Survey.
Attracting young people to the sector and building their skills is one way to address this gap. As such EAP and the Royal Academy of Engineering have been working to build the capacity of young engineering graduates in sub-Saharan Africa to help them enter the profession by facilitating internships, mentoring opportunities and career guidance to develop their skills, connections and confidence so they land jobs in engineering rather than pursuing alternative employment. More broadly, greater collaboration across sectors and between local, national and international levels will be needed.
With the rate of unplanned urban growth outstripping our ability to build safe and sustainable infrastructure, now is the time to focus in on our planet earth. Forget Mars! The real problems are here on earth, in our own back yard. Now.